 



Visitors to ground zero of the first 
atomic explosion face
the small obelisk marking the exact spot of the July 16, 1945, 
detonation in the
southern New Mexico desert.
 The matter-of-fact willingness of our brightest 
minds to build
such a bomb remains haunting. In the pre-dawn darkness, the 
assembled physicists
slathered on sunscreen in anticipation of what they were about to 
unleash, then
took shelter in bunkers and trenches nearly six miles away.
   The matter-of-fact willingness of our brightest 
minds to build
such a bomb remains haunting. In the pre-dawn darkness, the 
assembled physicists
slathered on sunscreen in anticipation of what they were about to 
unleash, then
took shelter in bunkers and trenches nearly six miles away.
JOE MCKIBBEN is an 
82-year-old retired Los 
Alamos physicist who
made the final connections to the bomb after it was suspended in 
its tower. He was
the last to leave the Trinity site before the explosion.
   McKibben, who still lives in the town of Los 
Alamos, spent the
final night at ground zero to ensure the gadget wasn't tampered 
with. Mattresses
had been laid at the tower base as a precautionary move in case 
the bomb fell, and
at 2 a.m. McKibben lay down to get some sleep. He was awakened by 
a pre-dawn
lightning storm that spattered him with rain.
   He closed the switches at the base of the tower, 
drove 800 yards
to a relay station and threw switches there, then came back to the 
tower. Because
of the storm the test was pushed back an hour, to 5:30 a.m. 
Communication was
difficult because scientists were using the same radio frequency 
as a nearby Voice
of America station. Finally, he made his final connections and 
drove to his bunker
about two miles away. Photo floodlights were turned on inside to 
allow cameras to
record the final countdown.
   Then the 
bomb went
off.
   "I had a photo flood on, but suddenly 
realized there was a
lot more light coming in the back door," he recalled. 
"It was very
brilliant outside." He threw one more switch to trigger 
instruments measuring
the blast, then rushed outside 13 seconds after the bomb ignited. 
"I ran out
and took a look at it. It was a big ball of fire, brilliantly 
colored and highly
turbulent. The color was somewhere between red and purple."
   What was he thinking? "I felt we had been 
successful in our
project. I knew the war would soon be over."
   Four hours after the explosion, the cruiser 
Indianapolis steamed
out of San Francisco Bay bearing a bomb nicknamed Little Boy.  It 
was headed for
the bomber base on Tinian Island in the South Pacific, where it 
would be loaded on
a Boeing B-29 and dropped on 
Hiroshima,
Japan, on Aug. 6. Little Boy was not quite
as powerful as Fat Man; it exploded 
with a force of
about 16,000 tons of TNT.
   After its delivery, the Indianapolis was 
torpedoed by a Japanese
submarine and its crew was spilled into the water. More than 500 
of them drowned
or were devoured by sharks.
 Pieces of a copy of Trinity's Fat Man, again 
fueled with Hanford
plutonium, were delivered by air to Tinian, assembled and dropped 
on Nagasaki,
three days after Hiroshima. It exploded with the power of 22,000 
tons of TNT.
   Pieces of a copy of Trinity's Fat Man, again 
fueled with Hanford
plutonium, were delivered by air to Tinian, assembled and dropped 
on Nagasaki,
three days after Hiroshima. It exploded with the power of 22,000 
tons of TNT.
   Because of the chaos and obliteration following 
the bombings and
uncertainty about attributing cancer deaths to radiation, 
estimates of deaths from
the two bombs range from 115,000 to 340,000. If the latter is 
correct -- and it is
closer to the historical consensus -- the two "gadgets" 
killed more
Japanese than all the Americans killed in all the battles of World 
War II.
   They also ended a war 
that had, with
conventional weapons,
already claimed at least 40 million people. In just one horrific 
example, the
Japanese army is estimated to have massacred as many as 200,000 
Chinese civilians
in Shanghai in 1937.
SEATTLE TIMES
photographer Alan Berner and I came to what the
Spanish explorers called the Jornado del Muerto -- literally, the 
Journey of the
Dead, a reference to the harsh route from El Paso, Texas, to Santa 
Fe, N.M., -- on
April Fool's Day this year. We joined the line of vehicles waiting 
outside the
gate to the historic
site.
   In a van ahead was Bob Swickley of Salt Lake 
City, who had been
a nuclear engineer on the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson and 
based in Bremerton.
Behind was Louise Kern, 67, of Penn Valley, Calif., who as a child 
had once met
Albert Einstein, the scientist who put his name to a letter to 
President Franklin
Roosevelt urging research into building a bomb.
   Both visitors said they just wanted to see where 
it all
began.
   More than 3,000 people came out that cool 
morning, their mood
neither festive nor dour, just curious. Visitors were directed to 
a dirt parking
lot by military police. A grill was set up to sell hamburgers. The 
National Park
Service erected an awning and sold books representing a range of 
opinion about the
nuclear age. As the day warmed, cotton-ball clouds popped from a 
taut blue
sky.
   The site was as empty and unremarkable as it 
must have seemed in
1945. It was so lonely then that the troops stationed there won an 
award for the
lowest venereal-disease rate in the U.S. Army.
   Desert vegetation has long since reclaimed the 
blast zone.
Brochures advised of the lingering radiation, but added that it 
remains below
health-hazard levels. There was no lingering sense of menace.
   Families posed for snapshots at the obelisk. 
Visitors looked for
tiny scraps of Trinitite the bulldozers had missed, obeying the 
admonition not to
remove them. A white-painted casing of Fat Man, the bomb 
itself, sat on a
trailer near the obelisk. A cyclone fence circled both, with 
photographs of the
explosion's sequence hung on the fence. Forming a shuffling line, 
people examined
the photographs one by one, studying an explosion divided into 
microseconds.
    A white-painted casing of Fat Man, the bomb 
itself, sat on a
trailer near the obelisk. A cyclone fence circled both, with 
photographs of the
explosion's sequence hung on the fence. Forming a shuffling line, 
people examined
the photographs one by one, studying an explosion divided into 
microseconds.
   The Rev. Steve Caldwell and 20 people from St. 
Charles'
Episcopal Church in Albuquerque gathered by the fence away from 
the main crowd and
consecrated the ground. "It seemed a fitting thing to do, to 
celebrate an
important place in peace and war," said Alex Zimmerman, a lay 
member. And the
bomb? "I think it was necessary. I'm thankful we were the 
ones who did it,
and not the other side."
   That view was typical of most of the Americans 
present. We
interviewed an Albuquerque physicist, a B-26 bomber instructor and 
a Guadalcanal
veteran who fitted pipes with asbestos at the nuclear labs in Los 
Alamos.
   The pipe fitter, 72-year-old James Garrison, 
sometimes chatted
with Oppenheimer, the lead physicist on the code-named Manhattan 
Project. "He
was a nice guy with a good sense of humor, though he talked over 
my head all the
time," Garrison recalled, struggling to breathe as he talked 
because of the
asbestos damage to his lungs. "I worked at Los Alamos, but 
when they told us
they had used an atom bomb on Japan, I didn't know what it 
was."
   The few Japanese among us were  disturbed. 
Takashi Otsuka, a
correspondent for the Japanese newspaper Asahi Shimbun, said he 
was unhappy the
Smithsonian Institution had canceled in January a controversial 
exhibit on
the
devastation the bombs wreaked on his country. "And why did 
you need a second
bomb against Nagasaki?" he asked. "This is a very 
important question for
the Japanese people."
   Two bombs dropped in August. Three more ready in 
September.
Seven due by December. Two hundred in the stockpile by 1949. That 
flash of light
gave birth to a new world.
   In less than three years, the United States had 
built an
industrial atomic-bomb complex as big as its entire automobile 
industry. Said
physicist Niels Bohr to colleague Edward Teller: "I told you 
it couldn't be
done without turning the whole country into a factory. You have 
done just
that."
   Before the Cold War ended, an estimated 70,000 
nuclear warheads
had been stockpiled by the nations of the world. Atmospheric tests 
had released
fallout equal to 40,000 Hiroshimas. The accumulated waste will 
take hundreds of
billions of dollars and at least another half century to clean up.
FOR THOSE who grew up
after World War II, the prospect of
nuclear annihilation was an indelible part of the era. I and my 
classmates
practiced kneeling by school lockers with our coats over our heads 
to protect us
from flying glass, laughing at the absurdity. We watched first-aid 
films in health
class showing bodies strewn in radioactive rubble. There was a 
fallout shelter in
my junior-high basement, and another in the basement of The 
Seattle
Times.
   Armageddon was our cultural backdrop. The 
baby-boomer generation
grew up reading apocalyptic novels such as "On the 
Beach,"
"Failsafe," "Alas Babylon," "A Canticle 
for
Leibowitz," and "Lord of the Flies." My family fled 
from Tacoma to
the Washington coast during the 
Cuban missile
crisis, hoping prevailing winds
would protect us from fallout.
   Psychologically, the nuclear standoff was 
arguably a major
contributor to the conforming discipline of the 1950s, the 
rebellion of the '60s
and the malaise of the '70s. It kept an era on edge.
   Atomic fission brought benefits as well. A sixth 
of the world's
electricity today is generated by more than 425 
commercial
reactors in 31
countries. There are 575 nuclear-powered ships and submarines. 
Five million cancer
patients get radiation therapy each year. Now 
the arms race is going the other direction, 
with the United
States dismantling 1,000 to 2,000 warheads a year, slowly working 
toward a goal of
3,500 each for the United States and Russia.
   Now 
the arms race is going the other direction, 
with the United
States dismantling 1,000 to 2,000 warheads a year, slowly working 
toward a goal of
3,500 each for the United States and Russia.
   Tensions have cooled, but the weapons can be 
re-targeted if
politics change. And what author Fred Kaplan called "the 
wizards of
Armageddon" are not convinced the world is a safer place. In 
the labs at Los
Alamos, the worry has switched from tracking Soviet missile silos 
to tracking
smuggled plutonium sought by terrorists.
   "There are too many reports of people 
buying plutonium on
the Russian market," said
Bob Kelley, a physicist who works on emergency
response to nuclear threats. "The U.S. is the most likely 
target. I think it
will happen. I really do."
   "Nonproliferation has become a much more 
difficult
problem," said Terry Hawkins, co-director of the federal 
government's
nonproliferation international security team. At one Russian 
warehouse enough
plutonium to make 20 rogue bombs has been missing since the 1950s. 
In others,
Russians told  him, "We secure these places with babushkas 
armed with
cucumbers, and we're running out of cucumbers."
   "It's not if anymore. It's when," 
Hawkins said of the
possibility of terrorists setting off a nuclear bomb. "And if 
it ever happens
in this country, we may not like the United States after it 
happens. There will be
a strong move to abrogate freedoms."
   That prediction was made before the bombing in Oklahoma
City.
THE FIRST PLUTONIUM to
leave the Hanford nuclear reservation was
a nitrate syrup sealed in a heavy stainless-steel container and 
carried in the
back seat of a sedan along the Columbia River to a train in 
Portland. As shipments
increased, the Manhattan Project switched to more formal military
escort. The bomb's development was incredibly rapid, and 
no state was
more intimately involved than Washington.
   The bomb's development was incredibly rapid, and 
no state was
more intimately involved than Washington.
   Shortly before World War II began, German 
physicists discovered
that atoms could be split, or fissioned, resulting
in the release of huge amounts
of energy. The news electrified physicists around the world. By 
1940, researchers
in the United States, Britain, France, Germany, the Soviet Union 
and Japan were
working on the problem of sustaining a chain reaction for a 
possible weapon.
   Japan did not have the uranium to make a bomb, 
but its
investigation of the possibility of building one did not end until 
physicist
Yoshio Nishina's laboratory was firebombed by U.S. planes on April 
12, 1945.
   Not only did physicists almost immediately 
recognize the
military potential of nuclear fission, but they also began in 1942 
the theoretical
work on a hydrogen bomb based on the fusion of hydrogen into 
helium, which powers
the sun and stars. The H-bomb would have the power of a thousand 
Hiroshima bombs.
Because of its technical difficulty, it was 10 more years before 
that new
escalation in destructive power was tested.
   Since the United States had the world's biggest 
economy and was
remote from the actual battlefields, only America had the ability 
to sustain an
atom-bomb project during World War II. Germany never vigorously 
pursued the
project, and top Nazis remained relatively ignorant of the bomb's 
potential. When
physicist Werner Heisenberg held a briefing for Hitler's 
leadership in 1942, a
secretary sent the wrong agenda and as a result key leaders didn't 
bother to show
up.
   American scientists, in contrast, convinced 
political leaders of
the incredible latent nuclear power in matter. But even with 
Einstein lending his
prestige by signing a letter to Roosevelt warning of the military 
implications of
nuclear energy, the project languished until the Japanese attacked 
Pearl 
Harbor on
Dec. 7, 1941.
   That it subsequently succeeded is one of the 
most amazing
science and technology stories in history. Making the necessary 
bomb fuel was
enormously difficult.
   The most common radioactive element in nature is 
uranium-238,
making up about 99 percent of the earth's supply of uranium. 
Because U-238 has a
half-life of about 4.5 billion years - about as old as Earth - 
only half of what
was present when Earth was formed has decayed away. That is why 
the planet still
has so many uranium deposits and the United States could open 400 
mines during the
Cold War and extract 60 million tons of ore for weapons alone.
   Uranium-238 does not sustain a fission chain 
reaction, however,
and must be modified into an isotope that can. U-238 fuel can be 
bombarded in a
nuclear reactor to make U-235, the fuel for the Hiroshima bomb. 
That isotope was
made and separated at labs in Oak Ridge, Tenn., during World War 
II.
   There was an alternative. In 1941, a University 
of California
chemist named Glenn Seaborg created an element with an even bigger 
potential for
explosive power. Since the previously discovered uranium had taken 
its name from
Uranus and neptunium from Neptune, Seaborg named his discovery 
plutonium: after
the planet Pluto and, coincidentally, the Greek god of the dead.
   Not knowing which fuel could be successfully 
manufactured or
fabricated into a bomb, the United States decided to pursue both. 
While Oak Ridge
would make U-235, a secret complex near the remote Eastern 
Washington hamlet of
Hanford would make plutonium.
   Fuel rods of uranium were irradiated in Hanford 
reactors to make
about a dime-sized button of plutonium for every two tons of fuel. 
The elusive
substance then had to be recovered by dissolving the fuel rods in 
acid and
isolating the plutonium in a complex, messy series of steps.
 U.S. ARMY GEN.
Leslie Groves, who had directed construction of
the Pentagon and then became head of what had been obliquely named 
the Manhattan
Project, had spent part of his early years growing up at Fort 
Lewis, near Tacoma, Washington.
He looked for a site in the West remote from population centers 
and with a
generous supply of electricity to run the bomb factories and water 
to cool the
reactors. Hanford, downriver from the just-completed Grand Coulee 
Dam and adjacent
to the Columbia River, fit the bill.
U.S. ARMY GEN.
Leslie Groves, who had directed construction of
the Pentagon and then became head of what had been obliquely named 
the Manhattan
Project, had spent part of his early years growing up at Fort 
Lewis, near Tacoma, Washington.
He looked for a site in the West remote from population centers 
and with a
generous supply of electricity to run the bomb factories and water 
to cool the
reactors. Hanford, downriver from the just-completed Grand Coulee 
Dam and adjacent
to the Columbia River, fit the bill.
   So started Washington's close connection to 
atomic energy.
   About 1,200 residents from the towns of Hanford, 
White Bluffs
and Richland were evacuated. Construction began in late March 
1943. At the peak,
51,000 workers toiled at the site, erecting 500 major buildings, 
constructing the
world's biggest reactors, dumping chemical and radioactive waste 
into the air,
river and soil, and for the most part remaining thoroughly 
mystified. Rumors about
what they were manufacturing jokingly included fifth-term buttons 
for Roosevelt.
In Santa Fe, residents joshed that the nearby Los Alamos complex 
was making
windshield wipers for submarines.
   President Truman revealed the truth about the 
project when
Hiroshima was bombed. When Japan surrendered, a Richland newspaper 
headline
proclaimed: "Peace! Our bomb clinched it!"
   Both bombs were dropped by the Boeing 
B-29 that had
been
developed in Seattle, at that time the most complex airplane in 
the world. In
February 1943, a test version of the initially troublesome plane 
had crashed into
a Seattle packinghouse, killing the crew and 19 workers.
   About 2,000 of the Boeing bombers were 
eventually built by a
variety of manufacturers for a cost of $3 billion, about $1 
billion more than the
Manhattan Project cost. Before Hiroshima and Nagasaki were hit, 
conventional
firebombing by these planes had destroyed large parts of 66 
Japanese cities,
burning 178 square miles of buildings and killing more than 1 
million Japanese
civilians.
   Boeing built the plane in Renton and Wichita, 
Kan., while other
manufacturers erected additional bomb factories. The Enola Gay, 
which bombed
Hiroshima, and Bock's Car, which bombed Nagasaki, were made by 
Martin in Omaha,
Neb.
   The plutonium bomb had another Washington 
connection. It
depended on an "implosion" idea first put forward by Cal 
Tech's Seth
Neddermeyer, who after the war taught physics at the University of 
Washington.
   In either a uranium or plutonium bomb, the 
fissionable material
had to be suddenly squeezed together to make a big enough mass to 
become
"critical" enough to sustain a chain reaction of atomic 
fission and
initiate an explosion. In the uranium bomb, a modified gun inside 
the bomb casing
was used to fire the uranium together.
   The plutonium bomb, in contrast, depended on a 
more efficient
but more complex implosion of its sphere of plutonium, driven 
inward by
surrounding conventional explosives. Neddermeyer won adoption of 
his idea over the
initial skepticism of other physicists, but lacked the managerial 
skills to run
the team that perfected it. That was done by Harvard's George 
Kistiakowsky. Destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended 
World War II, but
not atomic weapons. Proposals to put their control under an 
international
authority such as the United Nations quickly died, and the Soviet 
Union soon stole
plans for the atomic bomb with the help of spy Klaus Fuchs. In 
1949, the Soviet
Union built and exploded a copy of the original Fat Man, down to 
its wiring
mistakes. The nuclear-arms race was on.
   Destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended 
World War II, but
not atomic weapons. Proposals to put their control under an 
international
authority such as the United Nations quickly died, and the Soviet 
Union soon stole
plans for the atomic bomb with the help of spy Klaus Fuchs. In 
1949, the Soviet
Union built and exploded a copy of the original Fat Man, down to 
its wiring
mistakes. The nuclear-arms race was on.
   Instead of slipping into postwar oblivion, 
Hanford expanded. It
eventually boasted nine of the nation's 14 nuclear-weapons 
reactors and pumped out
more than half of all the plutonium the United States produced, in 
the process
releasing 467 million curies of radiation into the environment and 
becoming a
dumping ground for nuclear waste from around the nation.
   Boeing churned out new weapons systems, from the 
incredibly
successful and durable B-52 bomber to the nuclear cruise missile.
   Spokane's Fairchild Air Force Base became home 
to nuclear-armed
B-52 bombers on constant alert. McChord Field near Tacoma became 
an integral part
of North America's air-defense network. A communications antenna 
was built in the
Cascade Mountains. A National Security Agency listening-post 
satellite dish was
erected at the Yakima Firing Range. Nuclear submarines were 
serviced in Bremerton
and Navy surface ships unloaded and loaded nuclear warheads at 
Port Townsend's
Indian Island ammunition depot on their trips in and out of Puget 
Sound. The Navy selected Bangor, on Hood Canal, as one 
of two bases for
its fleet of Trident
submarines, the most powerful and invulnerable leg of the
American strategic "triad" of nuclear delivery systems.
   The Navy selected Bangor, on Hood Canal, as one 
of two bases for
its fleet of Trident
submarines, the most powerful and invulnerable leg of the
American strategic "triad" of nuclear delivery systems.
   The Trident is a culmination of a half century 
of squeezing a
bigger nuclear punch into smaller and smaller packages. Each 
warhead on a modern
D-5 missile packs 14 to 24 times the power of Nagasaki's Fat Man. 
Each missile can
carry up to eight warheads. And each submarine carries 24 
missiles.
   The B-29 flying over cloudy Nagasaki missed its 
intended target
point by several miles. The newest Trident missile, so far in 
place just on
submarines based in Georgia, can fly 6,500 miles, navigate by the 
stars and come
within 1,500 feet of its aiming point.
   The resulting potential for destruction is 
difficult to grasp.
To get some sense of it, recognize that a single submarine has the 
ability to drop
on 24 of the 25 American cities big enough to host a major-league 
baseball team
the destructive equivalent, each, of at least 175 Hiroshima-sized 
bombs.

[Trinity stories | Deeper into things | Interactive activities | Internet links | Seattle Times | Up a level]
Copyright, 1995, Seattle Times Company