anchor link to jump to start of content

The Seattle Times Company NWclassifieds NWsource Home delivery Contact us Search archives home pageHOME  An Unequal Defense  Portraits  About this project  Live Q&A  Reader comments

Sunday, April 4, 2004 - Tuesday, April 6, 2004
A case study in incompetence
For some, free counsel comes at a high cost
Poor defendants are guaranteed an attorney, but sometimes itís an attorney with limited abilities or one who is handling too many cases for too little pay.
· Portraits: How the system failed

A case study in exploitation
Attorney profited, but his clients lost
When it comes to felonies, an attorney's limit should be 150 cases a year, bar groups say. Last year, Grant County public defender Thomas J. Earl handled 413.
· Follow the money: 781 cases, 4 attorneys, $500,000

A portrait of justice on the cheap
Frustrated attorney: 'You just can't help people'
Washington offers little help to strained public-defense systems.
· Public-defense alternatives
· Grant County faces lawsuit over public-defense system
   What we found
When it comes to justice for the poor, Washington gets what it pays for

• Fixed-fee contracts cap attorneys' pay, regardless of caseload.
• Most Washington counties (in green) use contract systems to control costs.
• It's worst in Grant County, where 85% of cases end in a guilty plea.

A look at Grant County

· A look at Grant Co.
· Funding hasn't kept pace with felony filings
· One attorney's 'insane' caseload
· Alternative systems
   Barry Loukaitis PORTRAITS
The system has failed many people. These are the stories of a few.
   Q & A
Reporter Ken Armstrong answered your questions in a live Q & A about this series.
Share your thoughts about this series with other readers.

Today Archive

Advanced search

advertising home
Home delivery | Contact us | Search archive | Site map | Low-graphic
NWclassifieds | NWsource | Advertising info | The Seattle Times Company


Back to topBack to top