The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds |


Our network sites | Advanced

Originally published March 1, 2011 at 10:01 PM | Page modified March 2, 2011 at 4:37 PM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Danny Westneat

Seattle's School Board forced to depend on superintendent's honesty

Do you know who gets the least pay and among the least staff support in the Seattle School District? Maybe you'd guess janitors. Or food-service workers. But it's actually the ones in charge, the members of the School Board, who are supposed to be watchdogging a $560 million-a-year business on no salary and two assistants.

Seattle Times staff columnist

Related stories

Former Seattle schools attorney reverses course, offers to talk with scandal investigator

Interim Seattle schools chief says she's here 'as long as I'm needed'

Schools scandal: How did $163,000 end up at obscure nonprofit?

Seattle School Board ousts Goodloe-Johnson, names Enfield interim superintendent

Susan Enfield named interim Seattle schools superintendent

Silas Potter: 'I've been thrown under the bus' in Seattle schools scandal

Board likely to oust Seattle schools superintendent

Likely interim superintendent is experienced educator

Urban League: We 'did nothing wrong'

Brash furniture man made school program his fiefdom

Documents detail financial abuse in Seattle schools program

Vendors named by auditors say they did no wrong

Seattle Public Schools spending targeted in criminal probe


Superintendent Goodloe-Johnson's contract (PDF)

Termination of Superintendent Employment Agreement (PDF)

Goodloe-Johnson's statement (PDF)

Susan Enfield's resume

Interim Superintendent Employment Agreement (PDF)

Ron English's statement in response to Silas Potter (PDF)

Audit documents

Washington State Auditor's report (PDF)

Audit supporting documents (PDF)

Eakes' report (PDF)

Videos, photos

Gallery | Seattle Superintendent Goodloe-Johnson ousted

Raw video: Seattle School Board votes on Goodloe-Johnson's contract

Seattle School Board appoints Susan Enfield as interim superintendent

Raw video: School board members comment on financial scandal

Raw video: School board member Betty Patu speaks

Raw video: General Counsel Legal Advisor speaks at School Board Meeting

Raw video: Reactions at school board meeting

Raw video: More reactions

Raw video: School counselor reacts to firing of Goodloe-Johnson

Raw video: School teacher reacts to Goodloe-Johnson's dismissal

Some readers have written in to say The Seattle Times is hyping the Seattle schools scandal. That the schools chief shouldn't be blamed, let alone fired, for what was low-level cronyism.

"Why is this immediately a story about whether the public servant with arguably the hardest, most thankless job in Seattle, Maria Goodloe-Johnson, should lose her job?" one reader wondered.

It's a fair question. It's made more pressing by the top-line finding of an independent investigator that essentially cleared Goodloe-Johnson of any involvement in, or knowledge of, how a $1 million-a-year minority business program went so wrong.

So why should the School Board show her the door anyway?

All you really need to know is contained in one e-mail, dated Jan. 15, 2009. Two of Goodloe-Johnson's top managers, Chief Financial Officer Don Kennedy and executive facilities director Fred Stephens, are discussing what to do about a bad report showing this same small-business program was rife with problems. Mind you, this is from two years ago.

"The other consideration is with regards to next week's executive session," Stephens' e-mail reads, referring to a meeting of the School Board. "If I understood you correctly, you and the Supt. didn't want us to hand out the report."

Those italics are mine. Apparently everyone understood everyone correctly. Because that embarrassing report was never handed out.

My sense is the School Board is more upset about this — that the superintendent and her staff may have hidden things from them — than about all the wasted money, lost opportunity and bad publicity put together.

It also suggests something that needs to be fixed about the way the Seattle School District is run.

Do you know who gets the least pay and among the least staff support in the entire operation? Maybe you'd guess janitors. Or food-service workers. But it's actually the ones in charge, who are supposed to be watchdogging a $560 million-a-year business.

School Board members work for per diem only — a max of $4,800 a year. The seven-member board has just two helpers, who mostly do scheduling and office support.

"The way it's set up, the board is almost totally dependent on the superintendent's staff to give them honest information," says Dick Lilly, who was on Seattle's board from 2001 to 2005. "Because of that, what's in that e-mail, alone, is cause for firing."


Since there is no pay, some School Board members keep their day jobs. It's while moonlighting that they try to oversee an enterprise about two-thirds the size of Seattle city government.

Is it any wonder the School Board seems to suffer, at times, from "an abundant lack of curiosity," as I wrote in my last column? They probably are suffering from an abundant lack of sleep.

This is not to feel sorry for them. OK, maybe a little. I'm not saying that if they got six-figure salaries like the City Council then all would be magically right with Seattle schools.

But how about hiring them an analyst or two, so they can have a chance of knowing what they're doing? Or more to the point, what the bureaucracy they're supposed to be watchdogging is doing?

A reader forwarded me a "job announcement" recently that sums it up. The School Board is seeking a professional accountant and auditor, in light of the recent scandal, to help them vet the "internal financial and governance controls of the Seattle Public Schools."

The position is for two years. The pay?

"This is a volunteer position and compensation and benefits will not be provided," the ad says.

So figure this: At the same time the School Board is reduced to begging to fulfill one of its core duties, it has learned that this troubled program in the district not only had some of its activities shielded from the board but was allowed to grow to five full-time, paid employees.

During a hiring freeze.

It's enough to make you want to fire someone.

Danny Westneat's column appears Wednesday and Sunday. Reach him at 206-464-2086 or

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

More Danny Westneat

NEW - 8:00 PM
Danny Westneat: Westneat: Ex-cons need to earn equality

Danny Westneat: Seattle's School Board forced to depend on superintendent's honesty

Danny Westneat: Westneat: School administration's culture creates these scandals

More Danny Westneat headlines...

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

No comments have been posted to this article.

About Danny Westneat

Danny Westneat takes an opinionated look at the Puget Sound region's news, people and politics. Send tips or comments to His column runs Wednesday and Sunday. | 206-464-2086



AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech